Political Fiction

Reluctantly I have read a series of books categorized as political fiction: Julius Caesar, Democracy, All the Kings Men, Advise and Consent, 1876, and the Plot Against America. Although I have lived in the political center of the world for almost 30 years, I have remained neutral about the actors in the real drama; they run for office, win or lose, and then begin running again. Although I respect the democratic process, I am not inspired by its mechanics. In fact, I have become rather cynical. I have seen one party after another succumb to downfall, including the Nixon and Clinton impeachment hearings, the influence of lobbyists, the shenanigans of our elected leaders. I have become jaded about the good intentions of all involved. These readings, however, have forced me to explore politics more broadly, looking at the concepts, the drive for power and the consequences of reaching the top. My own disdain has been reinforced; political success is a raw form of power, not to do good but to be in control. The readings have opened my eyes in several areas. First, women are not the players in these dramas. They make take on significant roles. Portia is a wise woman, and Lucy Stark proves strong despite her husband's dalliances. Women do not, however, thrive on the undoing of others. Their lives seem to be less focused on the game. Secondly politics seems entirely negative; the word is not used in a complimentary way. Lastly, it appears that I am not alone in being turned off by this field, and it is depressing that new - and good - leadership is not inspired to enter into the fray. Perhaps my surprise in the enjoyment of these politically based works - and all the Kings Men is a work of art - has led me back to the raw facts and a deeper understanding of politics.